The Ides of March (2011)

The Ides of March (2011)
  • Time: 101 min
  • Genre: Drama
  • Director: George Clooney
  • Cast: Ryan Gosling, George Clooney, Philip Seymour Hoffman


Stephen Meyers is an idealist who’s brilliant at communications, is second in command of Governor Mike Morris’s presidential campaign, and is a true believer. In the middle of the Ohio primary, the campaign manager of Morris’s opponent asks Meyers to meet; he offers him a job. At the same time, Morris’s negotiations for the endorsement of the man in third place, a North Carolina Senator, hit a snag. A young campaign intern, Molly Stearns, gets Stephen’s romantic attention. Republicans have a trick up their sleeve; Stephen may be too trusting, and Molly has a secret. What’s most important, career, victory, or virtue?


  • The Ides of March: George Clooney’s directing again and he has done a heck of a job this time around. Ides of March fires on all cylinders using its directing, class A talented cast, and a creative screenplay to make a compelling movie. The cast is stuffed with superlative actors, Ryan Gosling at the helm producing fantastic work. Gosling stretches the character’s skin over his on flesh in a performance that grows, starting with a portrayal filled with nuances, then evolving to one filled with intensity. All the other actors work using their greatest strengths. Hoffman knows how to play an asshole, Giamatti knows how to play a snake in the grass, and Clooney knows how to play a “personality” character. The dialogue is the clothesline the film swings on the first half, then Ides of March broadens with political controversies, moral confusion, and scope in the last half. The Ides of March tells us that success is built on integrity and loyalty, but what it shows us is that you win by playing outside the box. Finely directed by Clooney, The Ides of March is an biting film filled with malevolent, dirty dealings of politics.

    Rating: 8/10

    Grade: A

  • “You can lie, you can cheat, you can start a war, you can bankrupt the country, but you can’t fuck the interns.They get you for that.”

    Since 2002, actor George Clooney has directed four films, with a consistent three-year gap between the release of each film. While not the best of Hollywood filmmakers, Clooney’s films are at the very least smart and savvy. His latest, The Ides of March, based on the play “Farragut North” by Beau Willimon, is just that. Willimon adapts his own play and co-writes together with Clooney and Grant Heslov (Good Night, and Good Luck, 2005) in this political drama that is more intriguing than it is engaging.

    Nominated for the Golden Lion, The Ides of March stars Clooney, Ryan Gosling, Paul Giamatti, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Evan Rachel Wood, and Marisa Tomei in what has to be one of the most exceptional ensemble casts of the year. Gosling plays the lead role Stephen Meyers, an idealistic member of Governor Morris’ (Clooney) campaign team who becomes embroiled in dirty politics as he struggles to stay sane in light of accusations, scandals, and tragedy. The rest of the cast provide excellent supporting turns with a couple of outstanding monologues from Hoffman and Giamatti.

    Intense performances drive this film, without which it would probably fail because this is a dialogue-centric film that requires actors to exercise strong verbal acumen. Clooney uses a lot of close-ups as facial expressions become paramount to conveying emotions as compared to the general body language. This is evident in the film’s lengthy final shot of Stephen’s face as he gets ready for an interview, and in another scene where Governor Morris is puzzled and apprehensive as a call by a recently deceased reaches his phone.

    Much of the drama in The Ides of March comes from the political tension that arises as a result of the mind games that each side play to gain an upper hand. Is this what we have come to know about politics? Morris’ determination to get a foothold in Ohio so that he could stand a chance at a nomination is juxtaposed with Stephen’s mounting personal problems, some of which are intertwined with his job. Clooney makes the effort to turn up the dial for intrigue as complications rise with each political and personal decision by the characters, rash or otherwise.

    Unfortunately, the film is less than the sum of its parts. It is engaging to a certain extent with the strong performances providing some needed bite. But the intrigue that is so well developed in the first two acts slowly fizzles out of gas by the time the film reaches its climax. The cinematic experience becomes slightly diluted when the film could have left audiences with a punch to the gut. Politics is indeed a dirty game, and Clooney’s film clearly shows this with some intricacy. However, it is not potent enough a bullet to strike anger in audiences to demand immediate political accountability.

    GRADE: B-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *