I Origins (2014)

iorigins_2014_poster
I Origins (2014)
  • Time: 106 min
  • Genre: Drama
  • Director: Mike Cahill
  • Cast: Michael Pitt, Brit Marling, Astrid Bergès-Frisbey, Steven Yeun

Storyline:

A graduate student, Ian Gray, is researching the evolution of human eyes with Karen and Kenny, in order to discredit creationists by proving that eyes have evolved. Seven years later, when the hospital takes an iris scan of his son and enters into the database, they appear to match with another person’s eyes, which suggested that their son may be some sort of reincarnation of the deceased man.

2 reviews


  • “You ever feel like when you met someone, they fill this hole inside of you, and then when they’re gone… you feel that space painfully vacant?”

    There are some movies that browbeat you and after seeing it, you keep pondering over it. Not because of the excellent computer manipulated images, the brilliant acting of one of the main characters or because of the story ingeniously stuffed with strange twists and surprising revelations. But just because of the concept and the deeper meaning behind the story. And the latter definitely counts for “I Origins” where the thin boundary between science and the religion is questioned. In hindsight I thought the title of this film is exceptionally and cleverly made up. If you look at the literal meaning of it, you’ll find out that it reflects the first part of the whole story. Where did I come from? How did I develop as an individual? In contrast when you pronounce the “I”, this will sound like “eye”, which in turn relates to the second part of this film, namely the eye as an organ itself. Now you can interpret this again ambiguous. First of all, the scientific research that Ian performs in regard to the development of the eye in all its aspects. And secondly, there is this saying that our eyes are the windows of the soul. It’s one of the most important senses that humans possess. The gift of sight to observe everything that surrounds us, to let us get enchanted by the beauty of everyday life and which enables us to record things and gain knowledge. They are, as it were, windows on the world. And the most important feature is that every person on earth possesses a unique pair of eyes.

    Ian (Michael Pitt) is a molecular biologist who’s irrevocable obsessed by the human eye. The entire purpose of his study is to provide evidence that the eye indeed evolved over the centuries. Something that creationists contradict. They stick to the religiously inspired belief that the whole universe arose from a special divine act of creation.


    The eye is the one sticking point that religious people use to discredit evolution.They use it as proof of an … intelligent designer.
    Intelligent designer…?
    God.

    Together with the first-year student Karen (Brit Marling), who overenthusiastically throws herself on a parallel line of thought about creating sight on a creature that lacks that despite million of years of evolution, he delivers a groundbreaking discovery. Meanwhile, Ian has met the mysterious Sofi (Astrid Bergès-Frisbey) at a Halloween Party. She possesses a pair of distinct wonderful eyes.This mysterious person becomes Ian’s second obsession and is full of strange and outspoken reasonings. Have you ever met someone who immediately starts telling you the story of the Phasianidae? In his spare time Ian photographes the eyes of certain people. Also those of Sofi, who suddenly disappears from his life the same evening. He doesn’t realize that this person is going to make him doubt his whole belief system with the concept of reincarnation as central theme.

    Revealing more about this wonderful film, would be a mortal sin. The best way to experience this film and to let it act on your mind, is by knowing about it as little as possible, like me. I guarantee you that for some it will be an impressive experience and the whole will force you to think about who you are, about your origin and whether spiritual forces exist that affect your human existence. Just as Ian I’m a person who’s faith is only based on tangible and provable arguments. I can not persuade myself to give credence to observations by people who have subsequently written those down thousands of years ago. As Ian says: “These beliefs can not be changed or substantiated by contemporary facts. They are unchangeable”. Could this omniscient and grand higher power exist ? The One who created and controlled everything. Who then again also shows infinite love and wants to take His creatures under his wing ? I can only conclude, if I take the present world into consideration , that He started a part-time job nowadays.

    But despite my firm conviction “I Origins” got me pondering about whether or not there exists, without us realizing it, an overarching power that has a profound impact on our void existence. Sofi beautifully phrased it and used strong arguments when she realized what Ian actually tried to achieve in his lab with the blind worms. These creatures aren’t aware of the phenomenon of light. And forcing them to mutate, they would be able to understand the concept of light. The theory she suggests, sounds pretty logical when you think more about it. Could it be possible that individuals exist who are mutated in such a way that they are able to comprehend the spiritual world that surrounds us. A comprehension such as light that surrounds the worms. In all honesty, I am convinced that there is something that is beyond our understanding. Thinking back about my near-death experience, that changed my existence in a drastically way, I came to a point where any logical explanation or science-based plea no longer helps. I can only admit that there’s more than just pure physical life only.

    The length of a review is to me a measure of how I experienced a movie. A short text usually indicates a meaningless, best-you-forget-it-as-quickly-as-possible movie. A significant volume means that it touched me and that I witnessed something phenomenal. Enumerating film-technical aspects which befell perfectly or glorifying the concise but also appropriate performances, is of secondary importance since the deeper meaning and message dominates.The entire film is laced with beautiful symbolic moments. The way Ian succeeds in finding Sofi because the same figure is appearing again and again, after which he’s confronted with those beautiful eyes staring at him again from a billboard. The conversations between him and Sofi, who obviously has a different perception about religion. The gorgeous equation Ian makes about their failed attempt to get married and the big bang theory, which happened 13.7 billion years ago, when according to him their atoms already clashed together. And the denouement that takes place in Delhi, India : the epicenter when it comes to astral energy and spiritual sensations. It’s no surprise that in the hippie period, many young people flocked to this country to get new impressions and learn about their inner development (the fact that hallucinogenic drugs was at the basis of this self-development,that’s probably beside the point). All this melted together and gave an unsurpassable result with a moving end, that even left me with a lump in my throat (and it was perfectly supported by the sound of Radiohead).

    Final Conclusion: A brilliant film and truly recommended. It’s surely one that’ll end up in my top list! If you get a chance to watch this gem somewhere, please do so !

    More reviews here : http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be

  • Mike Cahill and Brit Marling are two of the most interesting people working in film today. Individually and collectively, they have created works that baffle, tantalise and engage both the head and heart. In Another Earth, they imagined a duplicate Earth and alternate lives that offered redemption for the film’s star-crossed couple. In Marling’s Sound of My Voice, she was a mysterious figure who claimed to be from the future. Both films were unconventional dramas, detective stories tinged with a touch of the unknown. Their latest collaboration I Origins expands on their themes of the nature of belief and the power of the intangible to present a story that encompasses love, reincarnation and the scientific quest to disprove God.

    “What would you do if something spiritual disproved your scientific beliefs?” Ian Gray (Michael Pitt) is asked late in the film. A molecular biologist with a particular obsession with eye evolution, he and his new laboratory assistant Karen (Marling) are trying to locate a sightless organism with the PAX-6 gene (responsible for developing the eye) in order to build a human eye from scratch, thus putting to rest the notion of God. Ian is a man who lives and dies by the data, but finds himself dissembled by the eyes of a masked woman he meets at a Halloween party.

    Those eyes belong to Sofi (Astrid Bergès-Frisbey), who introduces herself as a woman from another planet and divulges little else. She feels like they’ve known each other in past lives and Cahill imbues scenes of their romance with an otherworldliness that attests to Sofi’s belief. Though Ian accuses her of being an irresponsible child that lives in a magical fantasy land and she believes it’s dangerous for him to play God, their love is powerful enough that its sudden conclusion at the film’s midway point engenders shock and disbelief. The second half of the film reaps the metaphysical seeds sown in the beginning when Ian travels to India in pursuit of a little girl (the wonderful Kashish) that bears a curious connection to Sofi.

    Though neither the story nor the science are watertight, Cahill hypnotises with his imagery and provokes with the questions he raises. As in Another Earth, the almost mathematical rigour of the screenplay gives way to a poetry of emotion akin to Tarkovsky’s Solaris or even Krzysztof Kieslowski’s sublime La double vie de Véronique. In the latter, two women are born on the same day, with the same name, in different cities. No explanation is given for how the two women are connected, though it could be seen as an exploration of the different paths in the same person’s life. Kieslowski was after a certain mood, a particular feeling in the film and in his other masterwork The Three Colours Trilogy. Similarly, Cahill captures an emotion as enigmatic and exquisite as the white peacock admired by Sofi.

    Click here for more reviews at the etc-etera site

Write your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *