Cell (2016)

cell_2016_poster
  • Time: 98 min
  • Genre: Horror | Sci-Fi | Thriller
  • Director: Tod Williams
  • Cast: John Cusack, Samuel L. Jackson, Isabelle Fuhrman

Storyline:

When a strange signal pulsates through all cell phone networks worldwide, it starts a murderous epidemic of epic proportions when users become bloodthirsty creatures, and a group of people in New England are among the survivors to deal with the ensuing chaos after.

2 reviews

  • “I thought when you get older, the nightmares go away. No, they still happen. They just grow up, too.”

    Aren’t you a real Stephen King fan or a zombie fanatic? Best you avoid this film. Something the majority in this movie better had done, when receiving a call. “Cell” is an adaptation of a Stephen King book. And I was eagerly looking forward to this one. Unfortunately I stopped reading halfway the book. Not because it was bad (After all, it’s still a Stephen King book), but due to a lack of time. That’s the biggest drawback when reading a book. You have to have some free time. And that’s just something I don’t have unfortunately. The advantage of a book is that the build-up goes gradually, there’s room for in-depth descriptions and the characters of different personages can be explored in detail. This creates a unique empathy rarely matched by the corresponding film. And that’s exactly where it went wrong in this movie.

    It’s as if King is becoming a glitzy, modern version of Jules Verne. He wrote this story more than ten years ago. In those days mobile telephony was already used on a large scale, but it wasn’t as widespread as today. Nowadays an entire generation is hooked to these electronic telecommunication gadgets. I’m convinced that in the evening a majority goes to bed with a sore thumb and exhausted, red eyes. And this because they were sending messages constantly while staring neurotically at the flickering screen of their smartphone. Enter any random public place and you can admire a flock of avid swiping techno junkies.

    Clay Riddell (John Cusack), a graphic designer aka fantasy artist, experiences something similar as he arrives at the Boston airport. The only difference is that the digital addicts act rather aggressive. A mysterious signal has transformed all of those who communicated with their mobile phone into a bunch of mouth-foaming, murderous psychopaths. Clay flees headlong and succeeds in escaping from these angry zombies. With the help of train conductor Tom McCourt (Samuel L. Jackson), he manages to get to his apartment. This is the starting point of a survival trip to Kent Pond where he hopes to find his wife and son unharmed. And when the girl next door Alice (Isabelle Fuhrman), who also survived the chaos unscathed (but had a traumatic experience), joins this duo they are off on a road-trip through an apocalyptic society.

    My first disappointment was the opening scene that took place at an airport. I rather wished they had used the location from King’s book. Although this setting was perfect to gather a multitude of cellphone users who end up as victims of the so-called pulse. The result is a collection of sometimes hallucinatory images. Such as the security guard who tears apart his four-legged friend. Or that frenzied teenage girl who runs head-on against a wall, with a toothless, bloody smile as a result. And as icing on the cake there’s a destructive plane crash (unfortunately with the use of some lousy-looking special effects). Sadly enough there is not much exciting to see after this beginning. The film looks just like a standard zombie flick afterwards, with some survivors hopping around who are being chased by a horde of frenzied “phoners”. The only thing still worth mentioning is the scene with the football field. Further it’s just a mixture of “The Day” with a sort of “Dark Skies”.

    The biggest reason why I wanted to watch it anyway, was on the one hand because it’s a Stephen King story anyway. And on the other hand the cast of course. I readily admit that a collaboration between Samuel L. Jackson and John Cusack is a huge incentive. Even though they both played on autopilot and it seemed at times as if it was reluctantly. For once, I want to put the lesser known cast in the spotlights. In particular those who portray the crazed, violent and mentally ill zombies. These aren’t Oscar-worthy performances, but there are some brilliant characters amongst them. For example the eerie-looking cook with his bulging eyes who kills every bystander with his huge kitchen knife. But especially the one who was part of the first wave of zombies marching through the streets. A fairly disturbed type. First laughing manically. And next looking around in amazement. So magnificent that I had to re-watch it four times.

    Eventually “Cell” didn’t meet my high expectations. It’s not really exciting. Not for a bit. And as a zombie-like film, it lacks the necessary gore nevertheless. And the precise meaning of this figure “The Night Traveller” also eluded me completely. The end of the movie on the other hand, wasn’t so bad, I thought. It highlights the hopelessness of the whole situation. From what I could read, it’s quite different from the original ending of the book. Oh well, as I said in the beginning, I’ve never read it completely. So I can’t comment on that. As for myself, I’d feel at home in between those brainwashed creatures, because these smartphones drive me nuts just by looking at them. The warning message from King is obvious. But again, this film is proof that there aren’t many adaptations that can match the magic of the written version.

    More reviews here : http://bit.ly/1KIdQMT

  • Imagine this: You talk on your cellphone and because of this, you become a programmed killer. You’re full of rage, you bang your head against the wall, you moan with your mouth gaped wide open (in a comatose state), and you pummel any JQ citizen into submission. That’s the gist of Cell (my latest review). John Cusack stars and because his Clay Riddell was on a payphone instead, he turns out to be the protagonistic hero. Lloyd Dobler, we hardly knew ya!

    Anyway, it’s always interesting seeing Cusack in a film not related to being a romantic comedy or a drama. Such is the case with Cell. In this sort of wireless server version of World War Z, he teams up with his 1408 co-star in Samuel L. Jackson. Their two characters tote guns, befriend each other, and wander a bleak landscape with other non-possessed humans. Safe to say, Sammy and John make a decent on-screen pairing.

    Now Cell with its shaky cam direction by Tod Williams, reminded me of a grainy creature feature. It also felt like all things apocalyptic and coldly ominous. So yeah, its ending may be a little abrupt and confusing. And yeah, Cell’s opening credits are cheap, cheesy, and sort of hackneyed. Oh well. There are some terrifying moments here coupled with some added philosophical assessments to boot. Hey let’s be real, studios and producers seem to be running out of ideas for movies about zombies with zombie-like premises. Cell despite all this, still answers the call (ha-ha). Yup, I guess I’m gonna recommend it.

    Based on a novel by Stephen King and helped by six production companies (you’ll know what I mean when you pop the DVD in and it takes forever to get to the beginning of the film), Cell is B movie glory, a flick only slightly bogged down by a non-zippy second half. Director Tod Williams (Paranormal Activity 2) does more than what’s required for your typical rental. He provides Cell with plenty of old school zoom ins and zoom outs making things atmospheric, ambient, and full-on kooky. There are times when Cell feels like it’s almost parodying most undead movies. Other times it’s terrifying enough to have you never wanna pick up your BlackBerry ever again. Critics have loathed Cell ever since it came out calling it amateurish, clunky, and inept. I digress. Don’t knock this film until you’ve seen it. Rating: 3 stars.

    Rating: 3 out of 4 stars

    Check out other reviews on my blog: http://www.viewsonfilm.com

Write your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *